- Indice
- L’ombra e le situazioni-limite in Karl Jaspers e Carl Gustav Jung
- Quaderno monografico – L’io e le sue ombre: orizzonti filosofici della soggettività – Introduzione
- “Archeologia del soggetto” ed “ermeneutica del sé”. Paul Ricoeur lettore e critico di Freud
- The Anti-philosophy of Michel Foucault. A Philosophical Account
- Der Anspruch der Gefühle in der Phänomenologie: Heidegger und Sartre en face der Epoché.
- The Transcendental Priority of Touch: Friendship as a Foundation for a Philosophy of Touch
- Dante’s Shades: Embryology in Purgatorio XXV from Plurality to (Near) Unicity of Forms
- L’immagine, l’ombra e la selva matriarcale nella Scienza Nuova di Vico
- Éléments pour une philosophie antilogique
- «Io personale», empatia e comunità in Edith Stein
- L’epigono dell’illuminismo scozzese: l’estetica di Archibald Alison
- Sul senso dell’invisibile in Kandinsky e in Malevič
- A Different Way of Looking at United States Presidential Elections. A New Analysis of Political Science
- Perché e come insegnare storia della filosofia
- Paura, conoscenza, potere: riflessioni su The Village di M. Night Shyamalan (Usa, 2004) e Kynodontas di Yorgos Lanthimos (Grecia, 2009)
- The Myth of Monolingual Academia
- Miguel de Unamuno: il primato ontologico della coscienza
- L’antisoggettivismo intersoggettivo di Karl Löwith. Dalla critica del “solipsismo idealistico” al recupero della dimensione relazionale
- EDOARDO ALBINATI, La scuola cattolica, Rizzoli, Milano 2016, pp. 1297.
- PAOLO DESOGUS – MANUELE GRAGNOLATI – CHRISTOPHER HOLZHEY – DAVIDE LUGLIO (a cura di), Pasolini, tra regresso e fallimento, «La Rivista», n. 4, 2015.
- VINCIANE DESPRET, Au bonheur des morts. Récits de ceux qui restent, La Découverte, Paris 2015, pp. 227.
- UMBERTO ECO, Numero zero, Bompiani, Milano, 2015, pp. 218.
- NADIA FUSINI, Vivere nella Tempesta, Einaudi, Torino 2016, pp. 202.
- ONORATO GRASSI – MASSIMO MARASSI (a cura di), La filosofia italiana nel Novecento. Interpretazioni, bilanci, prospettive, Mimesis, Milano 2015, p. 311.
- ALESSANDRO GRILLI (a cura di), Adone. Variazioni sul mito (antologia di brani scelti da Teocrito, Bione, Ovidio, Ronsard, Shakespeare, La Fontaine, Shelley, Keats), Marsilio, Venezia 2014, pp. 131.
- FRIEDRICH AUGUST VON HAYEK, Le condizioni economiche del federalismo tra stati, a cura di F.O. Reho, Rubbettino, Soveria Mannelli 2016, pp. 168.
- WILHELM VON HUMBOLDT, Stato e società. Scritti sulla libertà, a cura di Nicolao Merker, Ghibli, Milano, 2016, pp. 222.
- MARCO IVALDO, Fichte, Editrice La Scuola, Brescia 2014, pp. 202.
- DAVIDE SPARTI, Sul tango. L’improvvisazione intima, il Mulino, Bologna 2015, pp. 221.
- XAVIER ZUBIRI, Estructura de la metafísica, Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 2016, pp. 299.
Abstract: In this paper it is analyzed Paul Ricoeur’s critical comparison with Freud. We have highlighted that the psychoanalysis is interpreted as “archeology of the subject”, and as “hermeneutics of the human condition”. In particular, we have considered Ricoeur’s work of 1965 Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, first edited in 1965. According to Ricoeur, Freudian psychoanalysis is a form of determinism: the human action is essentially explained on the basis of an unconscious and primordial mind. In this perspective, man is not completely free: Éros, thánatos, and anánke determin the human agency. In opposition to Freudian psychoanalysis, Ricoeur proposes a teleological conception of human action. He develops a “philosophy of freedom”, and a hermeneutics of the subject based on human capabilities. In the last part of our paper, we have analyzed the great work Oneself as Another (1990), in which Ricoeur deals with the problem of selfhood in the context of contemporary discussions of “otherness.” We have particularly underlined that Ricoeur’s intention is to develop a complex ontology of homo capax. According to the French philosopher, to exist is to act: speaking, doing, telling, and assuming responsibility for the act commetted. The very “being” of human beings is to act and the effort to be. In this perspective, the human interiority is considered as dynamic production (enérgeia, conatus). Being as act and potentiality, accordingly, is the dominant meta-category that governs Ricoeur’s philosphical anthropology.
