- Indice
- Quaderno monografico – A partire da Kant: interpretazioni e metamorfosi del trascendentale – Introduzione
- Kant et les conditions «conditionnées» de la possibilité de l’expérience
- L’orizzonte metacritico della filosofia trascendentale nella «Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft» e nel saggio «Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte zur Bildung der Menschheit»
- Filosofia trascendentale e formazione al senso per la filosofia
- Der inhaltliche Zusammenhang der vier Momente des ästhetischen Urteils über das Schöne bei Kant
- Gunst und Geltung. Über die Veränderung von Maßstäben
- Kant and Aristotle on Altruism and the Love Command: Is Universal Friendship Possible?
- Fichte: la fondazione genetica del trascendentalismo kantiano
- Deduzione trascendentale e ontologia della conoscenza
- Il trascendentale come forma linguistica e storica: la proposta teoretica di Ernst Cassirer
- Transcendental Philosophy in Scotus, Kant, and Deleuze: One Voice Expressing Difference
- Giustizia e libertà nel dibattito tra Rudolf Carnap e Karl Popper
- Una filosofia politica dell’«ombra» nella Spagna del XX secolo: da Miguel de Unamuno a Eugenio Trías
- Wittgenstein’s philosophy of seeing-as: multiple ways to philosophical perspicuity
- Il bene del filosofo e il limite della città. Sulla politica filosofica di Leo Strauss
- Empedocle e Freud. Riflessioni su logica e linguaggio
- La teoria della relatività e l’eredità kantiana: logica, fisica e gnoseologia a confronto
- Lo sviluppo della democrazia liberale: un itinerario da John Locke a John Stuart Mill
- GIORGIO AGAMBEN, La vita delle forme, a cura di A. Lucci, L. Viglialoro, Il Melangolo, Genova 2016, pp. 297
- ROSA M. CALCATERRA, GIOVANNI MADDALENA, GIANCARLO MARCHETTI (a cura di), Il pragmatismo. Dalle origini agli sviluppi contemporanei, Carocci, Roma 2016, pp. 355
- GIORGIO CAMPANINI, Giuseppe Capograssi. Nuove prospettive del personalismo, Studium, Roma 2015, pp. 127
- MERICO CAVALLARO, La matematica in Platone, Studium, Roma 2017, pp. 304
- GIORGIO ERLE (a cura di), Il limite e l’infinito. Studi in onore di Antonio Moretto, Archetipolibri, Bologna 2013, pp. 286
- ROBERTO GATTI, Da Machiavelli a Rousseau: profili di filosofia politica, IF Press, Roma 2016, pp. 176
- HELMUT GIRNDT (a cura di), „Natur“ in der Transzendentalphilosophie Fichtes. Eine Tagung zum Gedenken an Reinhard Lauth, Duncker & Humblot, [Collana: “Begriff und Konkretion. Beiträge zur Gegenwart der klassischen deutschen Philosophie”], Berlin 2015, pp. 516
- DIEGO GRACIA, El poder de lo real. Leyendo a Zubiri, ed. Triacastela, Madrid, 2017, pp. 695
- PAUL GUYER, Kant, Routledge, Collana: The Routledge Philosophers, Oxford 2014, pp. 520
- PATRIZIA MANGANARO, FLAVIA MARCACCI (a cura di), Logos e Pathos. Epistemologie contemporanee a confronto, Edizioni Studium, Roma 2017
- CLAIRE NANCY, Euripide et le parti des femmes, Éditions Rue d’Ulm, Paris 2016, pp. 176
- STEPHEN R. PALMQUIST, Comprehensive Commentary on Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester 2016, pp. 640
- JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU, Emilio o dell’educazione, edizione integrale a cura di Andrea Potestio, Studium, Collana Cultura Studium, Roma 2016, pp. 752
- JUDITH SIEGMUND (a cura di), Stimme aus einer Debatte: Aufzeichnungen über Wie verändert sich Kunst, wenn man sie als Forschung verstehet? Hrsg. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld 2016, pp. 217
Abstract: This essay, from John Locke to John Stuart Mill, focuses on the development of the liberal tradition in politics. Much in the history of Liberalism was a set of important challenges to Hobbes’s emphasis on the necessity of an absolute sovereign. John Locke, for instance, argued for a limited sovereignty of which people were the true repository. But, the main problem of liberals was how to protect the right to the unlimited accumulation of private property basing, at the same time, their claims to liberty on the fundamental equality of all individuals. On the other hand, democrats had the problem of how to reach the right of all individuals to determine their lives where all possibilities of material well-being and progress were based on private property. For Mill, Liberalism needed Democracy. First, it needed Democracy for ethical reasons and, secondly, to avoid the total disaffection of the lower classes, the majority. His theory – affected by Bentham’s thought – is not based, like that of Hobbes or Locke, on the idea of certain inherent natural rights of the individual, but upon the doctrines of Utilitarianism. In Bentham’s view the obstacles to good government were the sinister interests of the ruling classes. In a democracy the ruling few could only further the interests of the whole community, because there were different kinds of institutional arrangements that limited the power of the rulers. Bentham thought that the rulers could still further their sinister interest even if there was a separation of powers and the good government was guaranteed only if the rulers followed the will of the people. The balanced constitution was the traditional answer to this problem, but Mill proved, that it would not work: the only way to guarantee good government was to create a system where the people elected their representatives. The chief mechanism for keeping the elected representatives in check was to have a short interval between elections.