The wild bunch is enrolled to the army: Sorites paradox and the problems for the ontology of war

This entry is part 21 of 34 in the series Vol 5-2020

Abstract: 1 gunshot is not a war, 2 gunshots are not a war… are 1 million gunshots a war? There is no such thing so investigated as war and, at the same time, still so outcasted theoretically. Ambiguity, vagueness and logical conundrums lay unsolved in the very hardcore of the several theories that considered war from a general perspective and, then, philosophically committed explicitly or implicitly. It is not the experience and observational data we lack but the general ability to generalize and expand our knowledge beyond what we can directly observe empirically and historically. Sorites arguments are everywhere in war theories: vagueness and ambiguities of many shapes inform the literature. Only a philosophical account of war can solve some of those issues: an ontology of war is needed to bring light into the heart of darkness.

View full Article in PDF

Series Navigation<< Ermeneutica del moderno. Un confronto tra Étienne Gilson e Augusto Del NocePuò esistere una città di schiavi? Distopia storica della Doulopolis (arist., pol. 1283A18-19) >>